|
Definition 3.1: Let n be an integer. A set of
m positive integers
|
Several authors considered the problem of the existence of Diophantine quadruples with the property D(n). This problem is almost completely solved. In 1985, Brown [21], Gupta & Singh [22] and Mohanty & Ramasamy [24] proved independently the following result, which gives the first part of the answer.
| Theorem 3.1: If n is an integer of the form n = 4k + 2, then there does not exist a Diophantine quadruple with the property D(n). |
The proof of Theorem 3.1 is very simple. Indeed, assume that
In 1993, Dujella [44] has given the second part of the answer.
Theorem 3.2: If an integer n does not have the form
4k + 2 and n
S = |
For n
S, the question of the existence of
Diophantine quadruples with the property D(n) is still
open. The conjecture is that for these values of n there
does not exist a Diophantine quadruple. For n = -1, there are
results which show that some particular Diophantine triples cannot be extended to quadruples
[20, 21,
28, 71,
75, 92,
116, 131,
134, 139,
150, 153,
156, 176,
205, 229,
234].
Dujella & Fuchs [131]
proved that there does not exist a Diophantine quintuple with
the property D(-1), and Dujella, Filipin & Fuchs [150]
proved that there are only finitely many such quadruples.
Theorem 3.2 was proved by considering the following six cases:
n = 4k + 3,       n = 8k + 1,       n = 8k + 5,       n = 8k,       n = 16k + 4,       n = 16k + 12.
In each of these cases, it is possible to find a set with the property D(n) consisted of the four polynomials in k with integer coefficients. For example, the set{1, 9k2 + 8k + 1, 9k2 + 14k +6, 36k2 + 44k + 13}
has the property D(4k + 3). The elements from the set S are exceptions because we can get the sets with nonpositive or equal elements for some values of k.
Formulas of the similar type were systematically derived in
[56].
Using these formulas, in [69] and
[70], some improvements
of Theorem 3.2
were obtained. It was proved that if
|n| is sufficiently large and
Let U denote the set of all integers n, not of the form 4k + 2, such that there exist at most two distinct Diophantine quadruples with the property D(n). An open question is whether the set U is finite or not.
Let n be a nonzero integer. We may ask how large a set with the property D(n) can be. Let define
Mn = sup {|S| : S has the property D(n)},
where |S| denotes the number of elements in the set S.
By the results of Chapter 2 we know that
Dujella [107, 123] proved that Mn is finite for all n. More precisely, it holds:
|
Theorem 3.3:
Mn
≤ 31     for  
|n| ≤ 400, |
In the proof of Theorem 3.3, the numbers of "large" (greater than |n|3), "small" (between n2 and |n|3) and "very small" (less than n2) elements were estimated separately. Using a theorem of Bennett on simultaneous approximations of algebraic numbers and a gap principle, it was proved that the number of large elements is less than 22 for all nonzero integers n. For the estimate of the number of small elements, a weak variant of the gap principle was used to prove that this number is less than
0.6114 log|n| + 2.158
for all nonzero integers n (and less than11.006 log|n|
for |n| > 400. It is easy to check that there are at most 5 very small elements forRecently, Dujella and Luca [132] proved that Mp < 3 . 2168 holds for all primes p.
1. Introduction
2. Diophantine quintuple conjecture
4. Connections with Fibonacci numbers
5. Rational Diophantine m-tuples
6. Connections with elliptic curves
7. Various generalizations
8. References
| Diophantine m-tuples page | Andrej Dujella home page |